<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mandriva stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:42:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamw</title>
		<link>http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>adamw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re very different search tools, and one is a KDE program, the other is a GNOME program. There&#039;s no real harm in packaging both (only Kat is installed by default).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re very different search tools, and one is a KDE program, the other is a GNOME program. There&#8217;s no real harm in packaging both (only Kat is installed by default).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martalli</title>
		<link>http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>martalli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t kat and beagle both search tools?  Do we need to have both, or could we get by with just one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t kat and beagle both search tools?  Do we need to have both, or could we get by with just one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abro</title>
		<link>http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>abro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyassassin.net/2005/09/16/mandriva-stuff/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Adam,

I agree it would be best if Beagle was fully functional in Mandriva 2006, but a fixed libwv1 package could be available as an update or downloadable elsewhere.

Another option would be for the next club release to ship with the latest Gnome desktop including a fully working Beagle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>I agree it would be best if Beagle was fully functional in Mandriva 2006, but a fixed libwv1 package could be available as an update or downloadable elsewhere.</p>
<p>Another option would be for the next club release to ship with the latest Gnome desktop including a fully working Beagle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

