Comments on: The Fedora bug process http://www.happyassassin.net/2009/05/06/the-fedora-bug-process/ Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:42:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: adamw http://www.happyassassin.net/2009/05/06/the-fedora-bug-process/comment-page-1/#comment-740 adamw Thu, 07 May 2009 15:20:03 +0000 http://www.happyassassin.net/?p=653#comment-740 Yeah, we could use it. Personally, though, I'd say the case where someone files a bug for $STABLE_RELEASE and you only fix it for Rawhide should be closed as WONTFIX; that applies the proper degree of humble pie to the situation =) Yeah, we could use it. Personally, though, I’d say the case where someone files a bug for $STABLE_RELEASE and you only fix it for Rawhide should be closed as WONTFIX; that applies the proper degree of humble pie to the situation =)

]]> By: mcepl http://www.happyassassin.net/2009/05/06/the-fedora-bug-process/comment-page-1/#comment-737 mcepl Thu, 07 May 2009 08:11:38 +0000 http://www.happyassassin.net/?p=653#comment-737 More and more I think about CLOSED/NEXTRELEASE lately. I always thought that it's use is complete anathema ... you just cannot say to reporter of Fedora {n}, that his bug is fixed in Rawhide (and will be released in Fedora {n+1}). Well, I am not sure about that as I used to be. Of course, we are talking only low- and medium- severity bugs, but I think we should be more frank about the real status of our bugs. Sometimes, we just want make new release for something silly. Just thinking. More and more I think about CLOSED/NEXTRELEASE lately. I always thought that it’s use is complete anathema … you just cannot say to reporter of Fedora {n}, that his bug is fixed in Rawhide (and will be released in Fedora {n+1}).

Well, I am not sure about that as I used to be. Of course, we are talking only low- and medium- severity bugs, but I think we should be more frank about the real status of our bugs. Sometimes, we just want make new release for something silly.

Just thinking.

]]>