Apr 01 09:00:51 ---	jlaska has changed the topic to: Fedora QA meeting | gathering people
Apr 01 09:01:53 <jlaska>	Fedora QA meeting starting shortly, we'll get things moving shortly ...
Apr 01 09:02:13 <jlaska>	show of hands if you're around
Apr 01 09:03:05 -->	drago01 (n=linux@chello062178124130.3.13.univie.teleweb.at) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:04:22 <jlaska>	ping adamw: wwoods: f13: viking_ice ... and any other QA meeting attendees I've missed :)
Apr 01 09:04:37 -->	spoleeba (n=one@fedora/Jef) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:04:47 <viking_ice>	hellú..
Apr 01 09:05:30 <jlaska>	viking_ice: Ahoj :)
Apr 01 09:05:36 <adamw>	yo
Apr 01 09:05:42 <jlaska>	adamw: heyo!
Apr 01 09:05:51 -->	wwoods (n=wwoods@nat/redhat/x-d630b04e3da14ae1) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:06:03 <jlaska>	wwoods: is back!
Apr 01 09:06:16 <wwoods>	WITH A VENGEANCE
Apr 01 09:06:20 <wwoods>	wait, no, just back
Apr 01 09:06:26 <--	basilgohar has quit (Remote closed the connection)
Apr 01 09:06:29 <wwoods>	jlaska: you logging?
Apr 01 09:06:30 <jlaska>	heh, no bruce willis please :)
Apr 01 09:06:35 <jlaska>	wwoods: indeed ... go for it
Apr 01 09:06:50 <jlaska>	we've got viking_ice, adamw  and myself so far
Apr 01 09:07:25 -->	basilgohar (n=basilgoh@118.100.50.137) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:07:45 <--	valente1 has quit ("Leaving.")
Apr 01 09:07:47 <wwoods>	well, first things - review last week's minutes/actions
Apr 01 09:07:56 ---	wwoods has changed the topic to: Fedora QA Meeting | review
Apr 01 09:08:50 *	wwoods trying to find the log
Apr 01 09:08:57 <jlaska>	https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-March/msg01142.html
Apr 01 09:08:58 *	viking_ice does yet another manual install test of beta.. 
Apr 01 09:09:04 <wwoods>	https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20090325
Apr 01 09:09:23 <wwoods>	first - mediawiki plugin fun. any updates?
Apr 01 09:10:01 <jlaska>	wwoods: no updates there I'm afraid.  tibbs|h posted an update in the mediawiki-semantic-forms review with some additional licensing concerns
Apr 01 09:10:13 <jlaska>	I need to follow-up on that and then continue with the review for that package
Apr 01 09:11:20 <--	kulll has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
Apr 01 09:11:22 <jlaska>	I'll follow-up with the infrastructure guys to get a live dump of the database ... it was requested that we hold off on that until post-beta
Apr 01 09:12:29 <wwoods>	'kay
Apr 01 09:12:31 <adamw>	nothing further from me there either
Apr 01 09:12:31 <f13>	I'm here, sorry for the delay
Apr 01 09:12:39 <wwoods>	f13: no worries
Apr 01 09:12:45 <wwoods>	next, radeon test day. it's happening RIGHT NOW OMG
Apr 01 09:13:21 -->	openpercept (n=openperc@unaffiliated/openpercept) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:13:34 <wwoods>	next, open installer bugs -> F11Beta. Well, Beta's out, so we don't need to worry about maintaining that as much
Apr 01 09:13:40 -->	itami_ (n=itami@h219-110-182-179.catv02.itscom.jp) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:13:52 <wwoods>	we *do* need to be sure that F11Beta blocks F11Blocker so we get those weeded out for Final.
Apr 01 09:14:05 ---	stickster is now known as stickster_afk
Apr 01 09:14:06 <jlaska>	we spent some time on that Friday ... and a few more additions this week
Apr 01 09:14:08 <--	mcepl (n=mcepl@49-117-207-85.strcechy.adsl-llu.static.bluetone.cz) has left #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:14:19 <jlaska>	specifically ... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Beta_release_notes#Anaconda_installer_issues
Apr 01 09:14:43 <wwoods>	next was adding stuff to the test result template
Apr 01 09:15:00 <wwoods>	I haven't added upgrade cases. jlaska, anything from the Beta page you need to add back to the template?
Apr 01 09:15:12 <jlaska>	I took that action item from last week ... but with help from wwoods, I've carried my changes from the Beta wiki into the template
Apr 01 09:15:27 <--	biertie has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
Apr 01 09:15:40 -->	pingou_laptop (n=Pingou@fedora/pingou) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:15:54 <--	basilgohar has quit (Remote closed the connection)
Apr 01 09:16:05 <wwoods>	next was adding known install/upgrade issues to the release notes
Apr 01 09:16:14 <wwoods>	jlaska already covered that
Apr 01 09:16:33 <adamw>	how about the thing about live CD -> usb creation
Apr 01 09:16:46 <viking_ice>	that should really be fixed..
Apr 01 09:16:49 <viking_ice>	asap
Apr 01 09:17:03 <wwoods>	everything I'm aware of wrt. upgrades is already in the release notes
Apr 01 09:17:14 <jlaska>	wwoods: we have the blurb about preupgrade iirc
Apr 01 09:17:18 <wwoods>	yeah, someone should add a release note about doing livecd-iso-to-disk
Apr 01 09:17:25 <wwoods>	jlaska: right
Apr 01 09:17:37 <wwoods>	"Upgrading to Fedora 11 Beta from Fedora 10 using preupgrade will fail"
Apr 01 09:17:40 <wwoods>	pretty clear
Apr 01 09:17:41 <--	pingou_laptop has quit (Client Quit)
Apr 01 09:17:44 <jlaska>	what's the release note around livecd-iso-to-disk ... the syslinux issue?
Apr 01 09:18:03 <wwoods>	yeah - it won't boot if you create it in F10 or earlier
Apr 01 09:18:03 <adamw>	yep
Apr 01 09:18:09 <wwoods>	installing new syslinux is a workaround
Apr 01 09:18:13 <adamw>	for now a note to upgrade syslinux from rawhide
Apr 01 09:18:18 -->	basilgohar (n=basilgoh@118.100.50.137) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:18:20 <adamw>	probably we should ship a syslinux upgrade for f10 or something
Apr 01 09:18:25 <wwoods>	indeed
Apr 01 09:18:44 <jlaska>	is there a bz on this against F10?
Apr 01 09:19:07 <--	jjmcd has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer))
Apr 01 09:19:27 <adamw>	not sure, i can file one if needed
Apr 01 09:20:41 <jlaska>	looks like spot, f13, and jeremy are the most recent folks to touch syslinux in f11
Apr 01 09:21:15 <--	basilgohar has quit (Remote closed the connection)
Apr 01 09:21:23 -->	Vorbote (n=vorbote@unaffiliated/vorbote) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:21:38 <f13>	only by accident (:
Apr 01 09:21:41 <jlaska>	f13: do you know what would be in the way of buildinga new syslinux package for F10 that lets testers use F10 livecd-iso-to-disk with Rawhide images?
Apr 01 09:21:43 -->	basilgohar (n=basilgoh@118.100.50.137) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:21:51 <jlaska>	f13: heh, yeah I know what you mean ;)
Apr 01 09:22:53 <f13>	I don't now of anything standing in the way
Apr 01 09:22:58 <jlaska>	okay
Apr 01 09:23:00 <f13>	but I'm not really familiar with the package itself.
Apr 01 09:23:16 <jlaska>	f13: would spot or jeremy be good contacts?
Apr 01 09:23:31 <f13>	more like peter or jeremy
Apr 01 09:23:43 <jlaska>	okay
Apr 01 09:24:07 <jlaska>	adamw: would you mind getting a bz in for that?
Apr 01 09:24:13 <adamw>	will do
Apr 01 09:24:50 <wwoods>	we'll get that bug id into the release notes, document the workaround, and talk to pjones/jeremy about updating F10 (and F9?) syslinux to fix the bug
Apr 01 09:24:54 <wwoods>	that should cover it
Apr 01 09:25:23 <wwoods>	finally, the review meeting happened and we pushed the big green button
Apr 01 09:25:28 <wwoods>	Beta went out, hurrah.
Apr 01 09:25:42 <--	basilgohar has quit (Remote closed the connection)
Apr 01 09:25:51 <jlaska>	wwoods/f13: did you guys also want to do an update on autoqa?
Apr 01 09:26:00 *	jlaska looking over previous minutes
Apr 01 09:26:07 <wwoods>	oh, sure
Apr 01 09:26:09 <wwoods>	let's do that
Apr 01 09:26:09 -->	basilgohar (n=basilgoh@118.100.50.137) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:26:10 <f13>	I haven't touched it since the beta rush, looking forward to touching it today
Apr 01 09:26:14 ---	wwoods has changed the topic to: Fedora QA Meeting | autoqa
Apr 01 09:26:19 <wwoods>	yeah, I poked at it yesterday
Apr 01 09:26:27 <wwoods>	and checked in an initial verifytree test case
Apr 01 09:26:53 <wwoods>	we don't have a watcher for post-tree-compose, but we have one test case for it
Apr 01 09:26:57 <wwoods>	heh
Apr 01 09:27:09 <jlaska>	is this something one can run manually now?
Apr 01 09:27:12 <wwoods>	I'm going to need to work on making tests interdependent, so we can stop testing if verifytree fails
Apr 01 09:27:30 <wwoods>	but the next thing to do would be some qemu-based boot smoketest
Apr 01 09:27:38 <f13>	I'm hoping to make a watcher for post-tree-compose
Apr 01 09:27:44 <wwoods>	(i.e. the lab-in-a-box stuff we talked about at FUDCon)
Apr 01 09:28:24 <wwoods>	jlaska: sure, but you need to install autoqa and have a tree available at a local path
Apr 01 09:28:36 <jlaska>	"install" ... from a git checkout?
Apr 01 09:28:46 <wwoods>	yeah. git clone and make install
Apr 01 09:29:32 <jlaska>	cool, what are the tests that you guys have now?
Apr 01 09:30:01 <wwoods>	at the moment there's two hooks - post-repo-update and post-tree-compose
Apr 01 09:30:18 <wwoods>	each has one test - repoclosure and verifytree, respectively
Apr 01 09:30:40 -->	u0m3 (n=alex@86.121.23.213) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:30:47 <jlaska>	very nice
Apr 01 09:31:23 <jlaska>	okay, is there anything you guys want to check-in on next week wrt autoqa ... or should we just leave as a general update again?
Apr 01 09:31:34 <--	basilgohar has quit (Remote closed the connection)
Apr 01 09:31:52 <wwoods>	general update should be fine - with a little luck we should able to be running both hooks regularly by next week
Apr 01 09:31:55 <wwoods>	but don't hold me to that
Apr 01 09:32:08 <jlaska>	what if we just focus on repoclosure?
Apr 01 09:32:13 <--	lfoppiano_ has quit ("Ex-Chat")
Apr 01 09:32:14 <jlaska>	getting feature parity with the emails that go out now?
Apr 01 09:32:18 -->	fab (n=bellet@bellet.info) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:32:24 <jlaska>	is that easier/harder/interesting?
Apr 01 09:32:28 -->	basilgohar (n=basilgoh@118.100.50.137) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:32:34 <wwoods>	f13: didn't we have that running on a host somewhere?
Apr 01 09:32:57 <f13>	qa1
Apr 01 09:33:05 <f13>	its a tad... verbose
Apr 01 09:33:24 <jlaska>	would it be easier to focus on ironing out the quirks with tests that don't require installs just yet
Apr 01 09:33:27 <f13>	we may want to re-think how it works.
Apr 01 09:33:33 <f13>	combining output into single mails or not
Apr 01 09:33:57 <f13>	yeah, I think willl and I could focus on the tree based tests
Apr 01 09:33:58 *	jlaska suspects that adding cobbler/kvm/lab-in-a-box to the mix won't make things tremendously easier
Apr 01 09:34:05 <wwoods>	right
Apr 01 09:34:07 <f13>	in parallel with lab-in-a-box work
Apr 01 09:34:25 <--	nphilipp has quit ("Leaving")
Apr 01 09:34:29 <jlaska>	I'd really like to plug in the lab-in-a-box stuff to what you guys are doing ... but there are a few "missing links" for me right now
Apr 01 09:34:52 <wwoods>	well, we're designing the test system around the tests we have available
Apr 01 09:35:10 <--	sdziallas has quit ("Ex-Chat")
Apr 01 09:35:14 <wwoods>	so you can't design the tests around the test system
Apr 01 09:35:28 <wwoods>	or else: infinite recursion
Apr 01 09:35:45 *	jlaska is convinced life is about infinite recursion 
Apr 01 09:36:09 <jlaska>	wwoods: yeah I see what you're saying ... I'll try to get in the loop with you guys to see how I can wedge what I've got into your framework
Apr 01 09:36:10 <wwoods>	yeah, I'm joking, that'll work fine
Apr 01 09:36:35 <wwoods>	but I'll need to talk to you about how we can make sure the autoqa stuff can launch (and process the results of) lab-in-a-box tests
Apr 01 09:36:45 -->	pkt_ (n=knoppix@athedsl-4558251.home.otenet.gr) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:36:49 <wwoods>	we don't need to set that up, just need to make sure the framework can handle it
Apr 01 09:36:52 <jlaska>	wwoods: okay, I see a sync-up with us in the week :)
Apr 01 09:36:54 <jlaska>	yeah
Apr 01 09:36:58 <jlaska>	cool, nice work guys!
Apr 01 09:37:15 <wwoods>	but figuring out better reporting for the existing tests is the first thing on the agenda for me
Apr 01 09:37:33 <wwoods>	and I think f13 will be assisting with that and working on a monitor script for post-tree-compose
Apr 01 09:37:43 *	wwoods worries about re-inventing gridtrees.py
Apr 01 09:38:00 <jlaska>	meh, if it works ... who cares what it looks like for now :)
Apr 01 09:38:13 <jlaska>	just call it gridtrees2.py
Apr 01 09:38:16 <jlaska>	:D
Apr 01 09:38:21 <wwoods>	yeah, but we have to learn from our (old, non-public) mistakes
Apr 01 09:38:30 <jlaska>	definitely!
Apr 01 09:39:04 <viking_ice>	for the record the lab-in-the-box some thing that the end user execute or is the plan to being able to remotely execute the tests
Apr 01 09:39:29 <viking_ice>	( basically just leaving the end user up to supplying hw )
Apr 01 09:39:30 <f13>	we won't be watching a .py file to be updated, we'll watch a path (:
Apr 01 09:39:44 <--	basilgohar has quit (Connection reset by peer)
Apr 01 09:39:45 <jlaska>	viking_ice: wwoods or f13 can correct me, but my thinking was the same stuff we'd run in an automated fashion, could be installed and run by users
Apr 01 09:39:57 <wwoods>	viking_ice: the idea is that the lab-in-a-box stuff should allow automated install testing on any machine capable of virtualization
Apr 01 09:40:11 <jlaska>	f13: haha :)
Apr 01 09:40:15 <viking_ice>	and the test que.. setup..
Apr 01 09:40:28 <wwoods>	right - so users could run it, but we'll be most interested in having it running somewhere inside the fedora infrastructure - or at someone's desk
Apr 01 09:40:45 <wwoods>	whatever, so long as we get testing
Apr 01 09:40:46 <viking_ice>	as in the user fetches test cases ( kickstarts file etc ) and executes them..
Apr 01 09:40:58 <jlaska>	viking_ice: that's a great plan for the future
Apr 01 09:41:21 -->	basilgohar (n=basilgoh@118.100.50.137) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:41:33 <wwoods>	we're not there yet, though
Apr 01 09:42:07 <wwoods>	but yeah, that's a good plan for the future stuff
Apr 01 09:42:34 <wwoods>	the only other thing I had on my mind was the schedule proposal I mentioned last week
Apr 01 09:42:58 <wwoods>	I did some research and talked to people and did some planning and whatnot and decided.. it's probably not worth the effort
Apr 01 09:43:36 <wwoods>	It'd be much better spent on the stuff we've already got planned - better tools for testing and reporting, so we can do more efficient testing
Apr 01 09:43:57 <--	Vorbote has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer))
Apr 01 09:44:03 <wwoods>	at least that's how I see it for the near future.
Apr 01 09:44:37 <wwoods>	so that idea is on Indefinite Hold.
Apr 01 09:45:00 <wwoods>	okay. what else do we need to discuss?
Apr 01 09:45:13 <jlaska>	can  I touch on something adamw raised last week?
Apr 01 09:45:42 <jlaska>	we're sort of discussed it already, so I don't want to spend a lot of time ... but adamw hilighted that we might not be communicating the known issues effectively
Apr 01 09:46:04 <jlaska>	from ... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20090325#Building_the_Beta_Known_issues
Apr 01 09:46:28 <jlaska>	we spent some time building out the known issues list ... are we happy with the result?
Apr 01 09:46:40 <adamw>	linky?
Apr 01 09:46:42 ---	wwoods has changed the topic to: Fedora QA Meeting | Known issues
Apr 01 09:46:46 <jlaska>	does the consensus from last week still hold?
Apr 01 09:46:54 <jlaska>	known issues - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Beta_release_notes#Anaconda_installer_issues
Apr 01 09:47:00 <wwoods>	https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Beta_release_notes#Known_Issues
Apr 01 09:47:03 <jlaska>	out consensus from last week - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20090325#Building_the_Beta_Known_issues
Apr 01 09:47:12 <jlaska>	Consensus was ... "#  Result - QA team must internally reference the Beta release notes known issues in all IRC and email communication. "
Apr 01 09:47:18 ---	dwmw2 is now known as dwmw2_gone
Apr 01 09:47:25 <jlaska>	it's early still ... but "how's our driving"?
Apr 01 09:47:43 <--	basilgohar has quit (Remote closed the connection)
Apr 01 09:48:08 <wwoods>	seems pretty good, anecdotally at least - everyone I've asked about bugs has said things like "I didn't see that in the release notes, so ..."
Apr 01 09:48:15 <wwoods>	i.e. it seems like people are reading 'em
Apr 01 09:48:29 <jlaska>	how much longer do we spend adding issues to the list ... a few things came up today
Apr 01 09:48:32 <adamw>	the public announcements i've seen at least referenced the release notes
Apr 01 09:48:33 <jlaska>	mainly syslinux I guess
Apr 01 09:48:33 <adamw>	e.g. http://www.osnews.com/story/21232/Fedora_11_Beta_Released
Apr 01 09:48:41 -->	basilgohar (n=basilgoh@118.100.50.137) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:49:03 <adamw>	it doesn't specifically link to the known issues as we discussed, though
Apr 01 09:49:13 <adamw>	perhaps i could poke rahul and suggest that to him for future release announcements
Apr 01 09:49:20 <wwoods>	also on this topic: so warren started up a blog for rawhide issues: http://rawhidewatch.wordpress.com/
Apr 01 09:49:21 -->	kital (n=Joerg_Si@fedora/kital) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:49:27 <adamw>	oh, yes, that's an AWESOME idea
Apr 01 09:49:31 <jlaska>	++
Apr 01 09:49:58 <f13>	I've lost my right click...
Apr 01 09:50:22 <wwoods>	we should coordinate with him - either send him updates, or see if he needs/wants help maintaining it
Apr 01 09:50:27 <wwoods>	it's already on fedora planet, which is great
Apr 01 09:50:37 <wwoods>	we might want to get it into the default bookmarks, at least for prereleases
Apr 01 09:51:31 <wwoods>	(he's not on IRC right now or I'd just bring him in so we can talk about it)
Apr 01 09:51:52 <jlaska>	that's a really good idea, perhaps checking in with him on how we can add issues to his list?
Apr 01 09:52:21 <--	giallu has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
Apr 01 09:52:58 <wwoods>	yeah, the first post sez "Please submit notable news to Warren Togami and it may appear here."
Apr 01 09:53:15 <jlaska>	and there we have it
Apr 01 09:53:29 <wwoods>	for the moment let's try to ping him on IRC (or, failing that, email him) with notable rawhide stuff
Apr 01 09:53:49 <wwoods>	I'll talk to him about whether he wants/needs help from QA maintaining that page
Apr 01 09:53:54 <skvidal>	or ask him if he can add poster to it
Apr 01 09:54:05 <jlaska>	skvidal: so others can contribute you mean?
Apr 01 09:54:12 -->	mcepl (n=mcepl@49-117-207-85.strcechy.adsl-llu.static.bluetone.cz) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:54:15 <wwoods>	skvidal: right. also I hear rumors that the infrastructure team might be thinking about setting up wordpress for fedora
Apr 01 09:54:30 <skvidal>	jlaska: yes
Apr 01 09:54:39 <jlaska>	skvidal: roger
Apr 01 09:54:40 <skvidal>	wwoods: yah - not sure of the last status on that, though
Apr 01 09:54:46 <wwoods>	so we might want a plan to migrate over.. so it might be prudent to figure that out before we go putting this link all over the place
Apr 01 09:55:02 <skvidal>	which is why having it on the planet is fine
Apr 01 09:55:12 <skvidal>	or ask infrastructure to setup a redirect
Apr 01 09:55:20 <skvidal>	rawhidebabyeating.fedoraproject.org
Apr 01 09:55:36 <skvidal>	nomnombabies.fedoraproject.org
Apr 01 09:55:50 <skvidal>	then you can give out that address
Apr 01 09:55:54 <jlaska>	does someone want to checkin with warren before next meeting just to see what his plans were and if/how we can engage?
Apr 01 09:55:57 <skvidal>	and when/if it moves...
Apr 01 09:57:28 -->	Renault (n=chatzill@AToulon-151-1-96-43.w86-197.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:57:45 <jlaska>	I don't mind chatting with Warren if there are no takers
Apr 01 09:58:21 -->	warren (n=warren@redhat/wombat/warren) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 09:58:30 <jlaska>	and he arrives!
Apr 01 09:59:04 <jlaska>	wwoods: adamw: viking_ice: f13: any other discussion topics ... or should we start wrapping up?
Apr 01 09:59:15 <adamw>	just to note that infrastructure is working on my calendaring proposal
Apr 01 09:59:22 <f13>	not much, just a lot of catch up to do post-bet arush
Apr 01 09:59:24 <adamw>	sounds like they're about to come up with a system that would do the job right
Apr 01 09:59:29 <viking_ice>	sorry was away speaking to the dbadmin
Apr 01 09:59:33 <adamw>	keep an eye on posts from susmit on infrastructure-list if you're interested
Apr 01 09:59:47 <jlaska>	adamw: I saw that ... sounds like 2 candidates being reviewed?
Apr 01 10:00:02 <--	Sonar_Guy has quit ("Leaving")
Apr 01 10:00:04 <adamw>	jlaska: it's moved on from there, neither of those did caldav, but susmit now says he's thought up a system which would work out
Apr 01 10:00:11 <adamw>	combination of zicula and phpical
Apr 01 10:00:36 <jlaska>	adamw: very nice, thank you for following that
Apr 01 10:01:51 <jlaska>	wwoods: any other topics on your end?
Apr 01 10:02:08 <wwoods>	none from me. jlaska, if you want to be the official Warren Liason then we'll review that next week
Apr 01 10:02:20 <wwoods>	so let's try to sum up the actions planned:
Apr 01 10:02:26 <jlaska>	wwoods: will do
Apr 01 10:03:03 <warren>	huh?
Apr 01 10:03:05 <wwoods>	[wwoods] autoqa: work on better (clearer) reporting from existing tests
Apr 01 10:03:12 <wwoods>	(test, really: just repoclosure atm)
Apr 01 10:03:22 <wwoods>	err, oops
Apr 01 10:03:25 <jlaska>	warren: I'll catch up with you later with some questions on your rawhidewatch blog
Apr 01 10:03:33 ---	wwoods has changed the topic to: Fedora QA | Action summary!
Apr 01 10:03:49 <wwoods>	[f13] autoqa: work on monitor for post-tree-compose
Apr 01 10:04:13 <wwoods>	[wwoods, jlaska] autoqa: discuss lab-in-a-box integration
Apr 01 10:04:58 <wwoods>	[jlaska] talk to warren and see if he needs/wants help with http://rawhidewatch.wordpress.com/
Apr 01 10:05:06 <wwoods>	that's all I can remember off the top of me head
Apr 01 10:05:10 <jlaska>	[adamw] - will file a F10 bug for the syslinux issue, initiate discussion with pjones or jeremy for building a updated F10 package
Apr 01 10:05:11 <wwoods>	what else?
Apr 01 10:05:20 <warren>	syslinux issue?
Apr 01 10:05:42 <adamw>	warren: you can't build a usb image of the f11 beta live CDs without an updated syslinux
Apr 01 10:06:05 <viking_ice>	so I guess if fedora is going to put up an wp instance we wont need the announcement one right?
Apr 01 10:06:41 <jlaska>	should we take the action out of meeting for syslinux?
Apr 01 10:08:10 <--	fbijlsma has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
Apr 01 10:08:12 <--	basilgohar has quit (Connection timed out)
Apr 01 10:08:28 <wwoods>	jlaska: not sure what you mean
Apr 01 10:08:48 <wwoods>	if that's all the actions we got from this meeting, let's call it done and get to work on that syslinux thing
Apr 01 10:08:55 <jlaska>	yeah that's what I wanted :)
Apr 01 10:08:57 <adamw>	i'll do the bug
Apr 01 10:08:57 <jlaska>	thanks ;)
Apr 01 10:09:29 -->	Sonar_Guy (n=Who@fedora/sonarguy) has joined #fedora-meeting
Apr 01 10:09:29 <--	kital has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
Apr 01 10:09:47 <--	warren has quit ("Leaving")
Apr 01 10:10:12 <jlaska>	thanks wwoods, I'll post minutes to the list shortly
Apr 01 10:10:30 <wwoods>	cool. thanks, all